On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Derek Chen-Becker <dchenbec...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looks like it. Probably private[liftweb] would work, too. In any case, the > scaladocs need to be updated to reflect what it's for. > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Kris Nuttycombe > <kris.nuttyco...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hmmm.... is this now TransientRequestVar? It's private[http], but >> could it be protected instead? >> >> Kris
David, do you have an opinion? Is there any reason to keep this private to lift, or is it something that 3rd-party libraries could make use of (as in this case?) Kris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
