On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Derek Chen-Becker
<dchenbec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks like it. Probably private[liftweb] would work, too. In any case, the
> scaladocs need to be updated to reflect what it's for.
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Kris Nuttycombe
> <kris.nuttyco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hmmm.... is this now TransientRequestVar? It's private[http], but
>> could it be protected instead?
>>
>> Kris

David, do you have an opinion? Is there any reason to keep this
private to lift, or is it something that 3rd-party libraries could
make use of (as in this case?)

Kris

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to