All, I'm admittedly quite a n00b here and I have very little Maven experience. Can someone provide a POM for the Nginx + Jetty configuration? I think that I would find it quite helpful. Thanks.
Jeremy 2009/11/20 Timothy Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu> > Your missing a trick here - there is a fork of nginx done by Ezra that > includes a fair load balencer. > > Google for it and you'll find the link as I don't have it handy - this > version would remove the need for your intermediate proxy. > > Cheers, Tim > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 20 Nov 2009, at 06:59, monty chen <montyc...@qq.com> wrote: > > > Hi,David Pollk! > > > > Nginx only comes with a round-robin balancer and a hash-based > > balancer, so if a request takes a while to load, Nginx will start > > routing requests to backends that are already processing requests -- > > as > > a result, some backends will be queueing up requests while some > > backends will remain idle. You will get an uneven load distribution, > > and the unevenness will increase with the amount of load subject to > > the load-balancer. > > > > Haproxy as a LB can: > > 1: Plenty of load-balancing algorithms, including a "least > > connections" strategy that picks the backend with the fewest pending > > connections. Which happens to be just what we want. > > > > 2: Backends can be sanity- and health-checked by URL to avoid routing > > requests to brain-damaged backends. (It can even stagger these checks > > to avoid spikes.) > > > > 3: Requests can be routed based on all sorts of things: cookies, URL > > substrings, client IP, etc. > > > > So, I use nginx + haproxy + tomcat(jetty). > > > > > > On 11月20日, 上午11时27分, David Pollak > > <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> I recommend Nginx + Jetty. > >> > >> Apache is the worst front end for this situation... it can only > >> support a > >> few hundred simultaneous connections before it falls over. Ngnix > >> on the > >> other hand can proxy tens of thousands. > >> > >> Jetty's continuations make it a much better choice than Tomcat. > >> You can > >> have thousands of open Comet request to a Jetty instance where > >> Tomcat is > >> capped at a couple of hundred. > >> > >> Once the Servlet 3.0 spec in implemented in Glassfish, etc., Lift > >> will > >> support 3.0 continuations and any 3.0 container will have the same > >> scaling > >> characteristics that Jetty currently does. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Neil.Lv <anim...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >> > >>> I have a silly question about the deploy. > >> > >>> Which web container is recommended to use to deploy the Lift app ? > >>> Jetty or Tomcat ? > >> > >>> I want to use the Comet to push the data in the app. > >> > >>> * Apache + Tomcat ? > >>> * Apache + what ? > >>> * Nginx + what ? > >> > >>> Thanks for any suggestion ! > >> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Neil > >> > >>> -- > >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>> Groups > >>> "Lift" group. > >>> To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>> liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<liftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > <liftweb > >>> %2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > >>> . > >>> For more options, visit this group at > >>> http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=. > >> > >> -- > >> Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net > >> Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > >> Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp > >> Surf the harmonics > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Lift" group. > > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<liftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl= > > . > > > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<liftweb%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=.
