Heisenbug - You learn something new, every day! Whining - I was the first to note my whining but, as I have seen these issues for such a while, it became an inevitable tone to my topic.
> *Autocompletion *- I only seem to get this on user.behavior and > default.behavior - not my own projects. I shall clarify what does and > doesn't work, and consider gitter, in raising an issue. > I almost never get docs and, certainly, not in the conducive way that I used to. Again, I should clarify when this is and isn't a problem. - Jump back/forth (including jump to source for third-party libs) You can't hold the current maintainers responsible for whatever "promises" the kickstarter may given in terms of expectations and feature promises - You are absolutely correct. Whining doesn't help anyone, contributing would be much more constructive IMHO - but it did find me proto-repl, so..! *Plugins*I do use parembrace and, haven't got to the stage of refactoring, though I'm wholly aware of its existence. I use linter and such, but have limited success with LTRolex, and some of the apps that build on linter. Shabby might be the right word. I like to analogise LT to a step-child. Is it real love that we share? Really? Really! But 'shabby' and the whining come from a (slightly) failed love for LT - we're on a kind of make-or-break holiday retreat! Sorry for being trifling. I appreciate the work of all you maintainers, and welcome more news and views on solid IDEs. Regards, On Saturday, 31 December 2016 16:41:33 UTC+1, afro54 wrote: > > Hi, > Please excuse any sense of whining that you get from this - I just want to > know if I can configure LT to be as useful as it once was. > > 1) I badly miss the instarepl and, despite my efforts, I haven't been > able to replicate the functionality. > Instarepl is available in Nightcode but, the app isn't quite there in > terms of multi-tab editing and a few other (minor) features. Sometimes, > I'm using LT to launch NC, which points to my frustration. > 2) I badly miss code-completion. Why on earth do I fail to even get this > feature? It means that, the more I try to explore Clojure software, the > more I have to try and remember. > > Essentially, all the good features that caused LT to raise so much more > money that Chris Granger wanted, have been disabled. Is that the case, or > can things be made better? > > I can connect to nrepls that I launch - this helps very little. > > Auto-complete works on my .behavior files but, not my .clj files - what is > that all about - I really need to fix that. > I require dependencies but, receive no documentation support in using > them. > > I ask because I am watching this tutorial using Cursive and IntelliJ, and > it makes me want to cry, that setup seems so productive to use. > > Is there any definitive method to get Light Table to be impressive once > again? Any configurations that can restore my pride in the LT environment? > > Even more generally, if people are dumping LT, despite being fans of LT, > what alternative should I consider? > > Thanks, all. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Light Table Discussion" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to light-table-discussion+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
