Only place I see the onion peeling discussed is here: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/issues/182.
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 3:50 PM, ZmnSCPxj via Lightning-dev < lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Good morning Corne, > > I think onion unpeeling never made it into the BOLT spec precisely due to > the problems with it. I think the unpeeling in question is essentially a > hop node (rather than the ultimate payer/source) unpeeling the onion in > order to find out who was being slow. Perhaps the discussion regarding it > is archived elsewhere; I do not know myself. > > Regards, > ZmnSCPxj > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > On May 22, 2018 11:47 PM, Corné Plooy via Lightning-dev < > lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > You missed the vital detail: that you must prove channel closure if you > > > > > > can't unpeel the onion further. That will hit an unresponsive party > > > > > > with a penalty.[1] > > > > Is this specified in a BOLT somewhere? I tried to find it several times, > > > > without success. > > > > CJP > > > > Lightning-dev mailing list > > > > Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > > > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Lightning-dev mailing list > Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev >
_______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
