On Sat, 6 May 2006 22:07, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Joe Neeman wrote: > > I don't think I've explained it very well, but suppose you want to do > > \break \noPageBreak. Then \noPageBreak needs to respect the changes made > > by \break so there must be a symbol that means "don't change anything" to > > the paper-column-engraver. > > Isn't it it more straightforward to have multiple commands, that are > independent, in the same way that you have to do > > \bar "" > > before being to able to use \break in nonstandard places?
I'm not entirely sure what you mean by this. Are you thinking of having multiple Events? With a BreakEvent, PageBreakEvent and PageTurnEvent we could tweak break-permission, page-break-permission and page-turn-permission individually. Is this any nicer than having an explicit 'forbid symbol, though? _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
