I'd be curious to know what one of the TeX / engraving gurus thinks ... Maybe Werner has an opinion?
(If the engraving gurus agree, I'd personally love to see the arrowed accidentals show up in 2.12 ...) Trevor. On 10/18/07, v!ictor [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Max, > > I agree with Trevor. These arrowed accidentals would be great to have... > even indispensable I would say. I'm sure many other composers will be > interested in having them as well. > > I printed out your 20pt example sheet in a standard laser printer at > 1200dpi. They look great. However, if you allow me to be ultra picky, I > might suggest stretching the arrows slightly (maybe an extra 50%), keeping > the width as it is. The reason being that the hight of the arrows now seems > to be exactly that of the separation between staff lines, so when arrows > fall on spaces ( e.g. d'#, f'#) the "staff pattern" is not interrupted > because the staff lines are not intersected by the arrow, which seems to me > to make them a tiny bit less noticeable than when the arrows do break a line > ( e.g. c'#, e'#). If you make the arrows a bit longer, then they will always > intersect a staff line (assuming they fall withing the staff of course), > therefore (maybe) making them a bit more salient. > Maybe a trivial observation, but it might be worth trying out. > In terms of design I think they do look feta. > > Thanks again for the glyphs! > > Victor. > > > On 10/18/07, Maximilian Albert < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Trevor Bača wrote: > > > > > These are outstanding! > > > > > > I don't have access to a true high-resolution printer, but the output > > > on my end is perfectly legible and I'd very much like to have access > > > to these new glyphs for use in my own scores. > > > > Thanks for your kind feedback. Much appreciated. :) > > > > > > > Also, I have a question: have you given any thought to adding these > > > same arrows to the quartertone accidentals as well? > > > > Indeed I have. But I figured it might be good to ask for some feedback > > first. :) It shouldn't be a big problem to get these working once the > > design is settled and approved, since they all have similar shapes and > > the arrow design is largely parametrized. Only the "mirroredflat.flat " > > symbol might cause a bit more work since the bottom is wider than that > > of the other symbols so that some curves may need to be adapted in order > > to integrate smoothly with the arrowshaft. But that can be tackled when > > the time comes. First, it would be nice to know if there is any interest > > in having these included and if anything needs to be improved. > > > > Max > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lilypond-devel mailing list > > lilypond-devel@gnu.org > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-devel mailing list > lilypond-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel > > -- Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel