On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:49:08 +0100 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote: > > Well, this is always the problem with open-source: it takes to > > time implement new features, and then it takes time to maintain > > them. (that said, this could probably be done in such a way that > > maintenance is not an issue) > > > Maintenance would certainly be an issue, since for each new > convert-ly rule, you > would have to think carefully if it needs a "conservative" > alternative and both > have to be implemented and tested. I beg to differ: you make non-conservative the default. If somebody complains AND offers to test the "conservative" option, then we accept their patches. But we don't need to mess around with "convervative" stuff ourselves. ;) Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
