On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Below is my patch of feta-banier.mf. >> >> While I don't strictly oppose to adding new glyphs, I am wondering >> why you are creating them. It would be more flexible to have a new >> function to do this, since you can vary thickness and slant >> dynamically. > > I don't oppose. However, I can program MF, but I have problems to do > such things in Scheme.
Lookup::round_filled_polygon() will setup the required scheme code if called from C++. Probably, we'd need to transform Stem::flag() into a Scheme callback to be able to override it. > Please have a look at issue #652 also. I did, but I have trouble imagining the pipeline you propose, as well as how the cost-benefit tradeoff could ever be worth the trouble. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
