On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 05:32:00PM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote: > 2009/3/1 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: > > Yes. I think that somebody (a Frog?) would need to make \cresc a > > built-in command rather than simply being defined in > > ly/spanner-init.ly (or maybe dynamics-init.ly ?) > > What I'd really like to see implemented is an equivalent of > define-music-function, but that would instead be called > define-music-tweak, that could take any argument (strings, numbers, > whatever) /except/ music expressions, and that would be entered > immediately /after/ the affected note (like an articulation), whereas > music-functions have to be entered /before/ the note they affect > (that's actually a ly:music? argument). > > And FWIW, I doubt any Frog could implement such a new infrastructure. > I certainely can not.
Oh, ye of little faith. :) I'm certain that a Frog *could* do it. Sure, it might take a few months, but it'd be a great learning process about the lilypond internals. If my summer plans go as I hope, then I might do it myself. Just make sure you add it to the tracker so that we don't lose it. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
