----- Original Message ----
> From: Mark Polesky <[email protected]>
> To: Patrick McCarty <[email protected]>; Graham Percival
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: lilypond-devel <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:08:52 PM
> Subject: Re: define-grobs.scm properties not alphabetical
>
>
> Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > IIUC, every grob is self-contained, so it shouldn't matter which order
> > they are in. Maybe in the past someone wanted to group "related"
> > grobs together (like the internal grob property list), thus the
> > comment.
> >
> > Alphabetical order makes the most sense to me in this case, with the grob
> alist.
I prefer case-insensitive so X-offset and Y-offset are near
the bottom (where I expect to find them). Let me know if
you object.
- Mark
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
