On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:14:03PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Mark Polesky <[email protected]> > > To: Patrick McCarty <[email protected]>; Graham Percival > > <[email protected]> > > Cc: lilypond-devel <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:08:52 PM > > Subject: Re: define-grobs.scm properties not alphabetical > > > > > > Patrick McCarty wrote: > > > IIUC, every grob is self-contained, so it shouldn't matter which order > > > they are in. Maybe in the past someone wanted to group "related" > > > grobs together (like the internal grob property list), thus the > > > comment. > > > > > > Alphabetical order makes the most sense to me in this case, with the grob > > alist. > > I prefer case-insensitive so X-offset and Y-offset are near > the bottom (where I expect to find them). Let me know if > you object.
Oops, I didn't read your email carefully enough. :-) The properties (except for "meta", as you noted) can be in any order. I am okay with a case-insensitive ordering. BTW, it looks like the grob list is not completely alphabetized (AmbitusAccidental follows AmbitusLine). -Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
