Le jeudi 06 août 2009 à 09:55 -0700, Mark Polesky a écrit : > \afterGrace <music> <music> > \afterGraceCustom <pair> <music> <music> > > Though I admit, I'm not particularly fond of this solution.
Neither am I. Why not just junk the <music> <music> form? > This would require modifying the define-music-function defmacro > (on line 764 of music-functions.scm), which may be interesting, > but most likely would create far more problems than it would fix. > Not even sure if it would be possible. I could be wrong, but I > expect a firm veto from Han-Wen... > > But I am curious; this is interesting. Could it be done? I've already thought about it a while ago, and I don't think so: the end of the arguments list of music functions is not delimited in ly language, so allowing a variable number of arguments in music functions would create syntax ambiguities and headaches. Cheers, John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
