Le dimanche 13 septembre 2009 à 09:44 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit : > > Is lilypond-book affected by the macro expansions? > > I assumed it was, but perhaps not. > > Here, let's do a quick test. Add an @afourpaper to one of the > manuals, but not the others. Wait a day, then see how they both > look on kainhofer.
This is bloody ridiculous. Instead of testing it this way as if lilypond-book was a black box, you could either use your memory and remember that lilypond-book is not a parser, it grabs bits of LaTeX/Texinfo code with regular expressions, or use your brain and (re)read the code in case you don't know or remember it. That said, I could have done the same mistake as you did a week ago by moving @afourpaper to macros.itexi :-P John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
