On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 03:44:00PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote: > Le dimanche 13 septembre 2009 à 09:44 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit : > > Here, let's do a quick test. Add an @afourpaper to one of the > > manuals, but not the others. Wait a day, then see how they both > > look on kainhofer. > > This is bloody ridiculous. Instead of testing it this way as if > lilypond-book was a black box, you could either use your memory and > remember that lilypond-book is not a parser, it grabs bits of > LaTeX/Texinfo code with regular expressions, or use your brain and > (re)read the code in case you don't know or remember it.
Or, since I don't give a rotten fig about this issue, I could just tell Trevor how he can continue to investigate. I currently have 34 emails which I consider too urgent to even move into my top-priority todo inbox -- including emails from you -- so I'm not inclined to spend even 5 minutes looking at unfamiliar code. > That said, I could have done the same mistake as you did a week ago by > moving @afourpaper to macros.itexi :-P Ok, I'll move them out. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel