2009/11/12 Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca>: > IM(NS)HO, the *only* reason to enthusiastically recommend > Lilypond is its output: for 95+% of the population, it's an inferior > engraving experience (i.e., high learning curve and no GUI), but the > difference in output quality is so great that it justifies my fevered > evangelism.
Human-readable input code is paramount. If that code is expressive enough (as it is), both this and output together really make a difference. IMO. Why do you think 99% of MS Word users are aware of only 1% of its features? -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org www.csmbadajoz.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
