On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 11:21:17AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote: > Le jeudi 24 décembre 2009 à 22:21 +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer a écrit : > > I would definitely like that option. Every now and then, when working with > > lilypond-book based projects, I also need to send e.g. an image per mail or > > insert an image into some word-processing app. In these cases, such an > > option > > would be extremely helpful. > > I see. Note that this option will work only with snippets included with > \lilypondfilename or snippets containing \renameinput. In the case of > lily-output-dir option is set, I'd rather keep filenames using hashes > and use the original filename only when linking to final output > directory, though, so the idea of a shared snippet database to save > processing time and space would still be possible.
The regtests are not used in the docs. Period. It's possible that a new feature might a file in Documentation/snippets/new/ which is an exact copy of a new regtest (actually, I've encouraged this), but we don't have many of those examples, and I'd expect them to diverge anyway (as the regtest covers more cases, or the LSR-bound snippet gets better explanations, or whatever). I think that any saving of processing time would be measured in seconds counted on fingers, and the simplification of keeping the output from input/regressions/ would far outweigh that amount of time. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel