Le vendredi 25 décembre 2009 à 22:17 +0000, Graham Percival a écrit : > The regtests are not used in the docs. Period. > > It's possible that a new feature might a file in > Documentation/snippets/new/ which is an exact copy of a new > regtest (actually, I've encouraged this), but we don't have many > of those examples, and I'd expect them to diverge anyway (as the > regtest covers more cases, or the LSR-bound snippet gets better > explanations, or whatever). > > I think that any saving of processing time would be measured in > seconds counted on fingers, and the simplification of keeping the > output from input/regressions/ would far outweigh that amount of > time.
All this is perfectly right. However, my reply to Reinhold was about lilypond-book usage outside official docs and regtests building, so your remarks don't invalidate my preference for renaming generated snippets in the final output dir, and not in out/lybook-db (option --lily-output-dir in lilypond-book). Best, John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
