On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 06:34:53PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: > Notwithstanding that specific issue, any suggestions, > objections, etc?
I object to the scheme indentation -- to the extent that we have a standard for lilypond input files (which isn't much), we follow normal scheme indentation. And before you ask, yes, we have a tracker issue open for an automatic tool to do this indentation (both standalone and for the docs), and yes, this might be formalized during GLISS. (or rather: the question of whether it should be formalized at all will be raised, and depending on the answer, an official standard might be created) Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
