On 4/26/10 10:21 AM, "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 06:34:53PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: >> Notwithstanding that specific issue, any suggestions, >> objections, etc? > > I object to the scheme indentation -- to the extent that we have a > standard for lilypond input files (which isn't much), we follow > normal scheme indentation. The new patch actually follows normal Scheme indentation, where the previous examples didn't. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material. Mark Polesky
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material. Carl Sorensen
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions mater... Mark Polesky
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions m... Mark Polesky
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functio... Carl Sorensen
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions material. Graham Percival
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions mater... Carl Sorensen
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functions m... Graham Percival
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music functio... Carl Sorensen
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize music fu... Nicolas Sceaux
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize musi... Mark Polesky
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize musi... Carl Sorensen
- Re: PATCH: Doc: Reorganize ... Kieren MacMillan