On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:51 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> writes: > >> We have a bunch of items with "label:bounty". Many come from more >> than two years ago, so I'm not certain if bounty is still "open". > > Who gets the bounty? Developer or committer?
Whoever wrote the patch, I assume. But I really don't see this working as an official system at the moment. > Maybe I should start setting bounties for patches of my own in order to > get them committed. Heh. BTW, although I gave the generalized markup-command patch a "priority-low", that's just because I don't understand it and AFAIK it's not in response to a high-priority issue. It still shows up in the list of patches: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=2&q=label%3Apatch and I (unofficially) consider all of those to be release-blockers -- I don't want to release 2.14 if there's unresolved patches floating around. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
