On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:40:05PM +0000, john.mander...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 2010/10/17 21:14:11, Graham Percival wrote:
> >Along the way, I've found that firefox is profoundly unhappy with
> "..//..".
> >That may have prompted me to add the extra ../ to translations
> initially. Or
> >maybe there's still something that's messed up.
>
> This new patch isn't good, not because of the double-slash, but because
> it breaks offline docs "Back to..." link.
Eh? The patch only does stuff for the online target. That's what
line 349 is supposed to do:
if target == 'online':
If the patch breaks offline docs, then something is /really/
messed up. Did my 819365f311a832c5cc57f086016069efdbee91fa break
the offline docs?
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
