On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:55 AM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Disagree. A "loose line" in typesetting is one with loose (as opposed > to tight) spacing. > > Instead of "loose", I'd prefer "free", "wild", uhm "non-staff", > "unattached" and likely a number of other expressions. But "loose" is > really misleading.
"free" is quite good. However, this only refers to vertical spacing (since Lyric lines are not free at all horizontally). > Systematic or not, the new naming scheme gets less descriptive and more > ugly with every iteration. OTOH, maybe we're just too used to the old naming scheme to appreciate the new one (well, I know I am :) Cheers, Valentin. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel