Okay, it looks like we're converging here...
Renaming proposals, round 4:
CURRENT NAME PROPOSED NAME
------------ -------------
next-staff staff-staff
default-next-staff default-staff-staff
inter-staff nonstaff-relatedstaff
inter-loose-line nonstaff-nonstaff
non-affinity nonstaff-unrelatedstaff
between-staff withingroup-staff-staff
after-last-staff staffgroup-staff
It seems that no one here is opposed to the odd-looking
compound words ("withingroup", "relatedstaff" etc.), which
surprises me a little. They remind me of the common
mistake of reading "manslaughter" as "man's laughter"...
Anyway, if nobody minds these, I guess I don't mind either.
And lastly, I still think reference/opposite is better than
related/unrelated:
nonstaff-referencestaff
nonstaff-oppositestaff
But I won't protest. Any last thoughts/votes, or should I
go ahead with the proposals listed above?
- Mark
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
