> Renaming proposals, round 4:
>
> CURRENT NAME PROPOSED NAME
> ------------ -------------
> next-staff staff-staff
> default-next-staff default-staff-staff
>
> inter-staff nonstaff-relatedstaff
> inter-loose-line nonstaff-nonstaff
> non-affinity nonstaff-unrelatedstaff
>
> between-staff withingroup-staff-staff
> after-last-staff staffgroup-staff
This is fine with me.
> And lastly, I still think reference/opposite is better than
> related/unrelated:
>
> nonstaff-referencestaff
> nonstaff-oppositestaff
Well, `related/unrelated' refers to the functionality, and `reference'
too. However, `opposite' refers to a visual concept which IMHO
doesn't harmonize well with the other terms.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
