On 12/21/10 1:14 PM, "Valentin Villenave" <valen...@villenave.net> wrote:
> Greetings everybody, hi Trevor, > > I've been looking at the LM 4.4.2 Placement of objects > Within-staff > objects, and I'm not sure we want to use "Down/Left" and "Up/Right" in > the table. Yes, we all know that -1 and 1 may respectively mean either > "down" or "left" and either "up" or "right", but in this table we're > *only* documenting objects that are aligned vertically! I agree with you here. I think it should be Down and Up in the table headings. > > Oh, and by the way: we have \textSpannerDown for text spanners, but > not \textDown for simple TextScript objects (that are quite likely to > be needed by new users). Anyone against adding textDown, textUp, > textNeutral? Why should we add \textDown, \textUp, and \textNeutral? TextScript is markup text, IIUC, and markup text attached to a note is always preceded by ^ - or _, isn't it? It seems to me that having special commands will just cause confusion. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
