Il giorno mer, 05/01/2011 alle 11.36 +0100, Alexander Kobel ha scritto:
> I tend not to like those assembled logos very much. Most of the time,
> they end up too clumsy IMHO; more like something quickly hacked
> together, just for the sake of quoting musical symbols.
You mean something like this? (my 5 minute try, really horrible)
\version "2.13.45"
\markup {
\lower #.5 { \number 1 }
\musicglyph #"scripts.ustaccatissimo"
\lower #.5 { \number 1 }
\musicglyph #"scripts.ustaccatissimo"
\lower #.5 { \dynamic p }
\musicglyph #"noteheads.s0" \hspace #1
\musicglyph #"scripts.prall"
\semiflat
}
> However, I'd certainly use a predefined command for the inclusion of
> something like Valentin's logos from lilynet.net.
That's a nice idea. Maybe we could provide a black&white logo also...
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
