Looks generally good to me.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4277067/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4277067/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1690 Documentation/notation/input.itely:1690: more realistic MIDI output is available by means of the Articulate could "the Articulate script" be a @ref{} ? http://codereview.appspot.com/4277067/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode2307 Documentation/notation/input.itely:2307: @unnumberedsubsubsec Using the Articulate script IMO, the @unnumberedsubsubsec doesn't add anything. I suggest omitting this line entirely. If you really really want that line there for some reason, then please add a @node right above it, to match the doc policy. http://codereview.appspot.com/4277067/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode2316 Documentation/notation/input.itely:2316: and in the @code{\score} section do I do not believe that you "have to" include the \unfoldRepeats section. Could you just change this to: To create a MIDI file with all repeats played, add this to your \score: http://codereview.appspot.com/4277067/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
