New patch coming soon after license update.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4277067/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4277067/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode1690
Documentation/notation/input.itely:1690: more realistic MIDI output is
available by means of the Articulate
On 2011/03/20 17:30:46, Graham Percival wrote:
could "the Articulate script" be a @ref{} ?
Done.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4277067/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode2307
Documentation/notation/input.itely:2307: @unnumberedsubsubsec Using the
Articulate script
On 2011/03/20 17:30:46, Graham Percival wrote:
IMO, the @unnumberedsubsubsec doesn't add anything. I suggest
omitting this
line entirely.
If you really really want that line there for some reason, then please
add a
@node right above it, to match the doc policy.
I agree it is unnecessary. I added no @nodes because previous sections
@unnumberedsubsubsec Unsupported in MIDI etc don't have a @node.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4277067/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode2316
Documentation/notation/input.itely:2316: and in the @code{\score}
section do
On 2011/03/20 17:30:46, Graham Percival wrote:
I do not believe that you "have to" include the \unfoldRepeats
section. Could
you just change this to:
To create a MIDI file with all repeats played, add this to your
\score:
Here, I just copied the lines provided by Peter. \articulate is needed
AFAIK, \unfoldRepeats not essential but still could be for trills.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4277067/
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
