http://codereview.appspot.com/4518053/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely File Documentation/notation/staff.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4518053/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely#newcode1022 Documentation/notation/staff.itely:1022: @cindex quote, voices could we keep the old @cindex as well? I'm fine with adding the new ones; just don't remove the old ones. http://codereview.appspot.com/4518053/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely#newcode1045 Documentation/notation/staff.itely:1045: \addQuote "flute" @{ \fluteNotes @} could we keep a definition for \fluteNotes ? again, I'm happy to have the name change, but I'd like to see some notes actually being defined. alternately, remove the @example and just go directly into the @lilypond. That would be my first instinct, actually, although I can't claim to have looked at this in detail. http://codereview.appspot.com/4518053/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
