My suggestion was tiny compared to this patch.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4518053/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely File Documentation/notation/staff.itely (left): http://codereview.appspot.com/4518053/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely#oldcode1086 Documentation/notation/staff.itely:1086: Quotations recognize instrument transposition settings for both I added this text only a couple months ago, so of course I suggest to keep it. I think we need to amplify the point that \quoteDuring handles transpositions of both quoted and quoting parts. This is the main point of the \transposition command, but the section @ref{instrument transpositions} does not explain it very well because it does not have this example showing how \quoteDuring works. http://codereview.appspot.com/4518053/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely File Documentation/notation/staff.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4518053/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely#newcode1040 Documentation/notation/staff.itely:1040: Before a part can be quoted, the @code{\addQuote} command must be used, In the original, 'before' was misleading, and we are not initializing a 'fragment'. A true statement is: The @code{\addQuote} command, used in the top level scope, defines a stream of music from which fragments can be quoted. http://codereview.appspot.com/4518053/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely#newcode1045 Documentation/notation/staff.itely:1045: \addQuote "flute" @{ \fluteNotes @}
remove the @example and just go directly into the @lilypond.
That would be better. http://codereview.appspot.com/4518053/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely#newcode1072 Documentation/notation/staff.itely:1072: If the music expression used in @code{\quoteDuring} contains notes I suggest removing this whole paragraph and @lilypond. 1. The original text was wrong: \quoteDuring does not create another Voice for polyphony; instead it adds notes to the existing Voice to make chords. 2. Using \cueDuring, by contrast, *does* add a voice and create a polyphonic situation, and in fact I have found that to be useful, but was discouraged from trying it because of the old text. http://codereview.appspot.com/4518053/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely#newcode1082 Documentation/notation/staff.itely:1082: c4 cis c b \quoteDuring #"flute" { e4 dis b a } c4 cis c b \quoteDuring #"flute" { e4 r8 ais b4 a } If you do decide to keep this @lilypond, at least make it output something sensible. http://codereview.appspot.com/4518053/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely#newcode1101 Documentation/notation/staff.itely:1101: a4 gis g gis | b4^"quoted" r8 ais\p a4( f) \key d\major b4 ais a ais | cis4^"quoted" r8 bis\p b4( f) so that this example realistically shows the same concert-pitch notes as the earlier examples. (I should have caught this error months ago.) http://codereview.appspot.com/4518053/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely#newcode1120 Documentation/notation/staff.itely:1120: markups, etc. and is inserted into the music expression. It is possible markups, etc. --[and is inserted into the music expression]-- http://codereview.appspot.com/4518053/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel