On 6/9/11 3:18 PM, "Janek Warchoł" <lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/6/8-9 Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu>:
>> After looking more at this, it appears that the .otf-table files are created
>> by parsing the log files created during font creation. See
>> scripts/build/mf-to-table.py
>>
>> So this means that your magic command would need to emit a keyword and a
>> real value to the log file, and mf-to-table.py would need to be modified to
>> read the keyword and the value and put it in the table file.
>
> Yes, and i'll also have to add a function to mf/feta-autometric.mf,
> similar to set_char_box.
> I'm finding the actual place in which the value is being output to logfile.
>
> But there's another question: currently all glyphs in
> feta-noteheadsFONTSIZE.log have the same amount of characteristics.
> Adding another values only to the flags, if at all possible, would
> perhaps make reading the logfiles more diffucult. Perhaps it would be
> good to move flags into a separate font file? (i.e. separate
> feta-noteheads into actual feta-noteheads and feta-flags)
That sounds to me like a reasonable approach. Rather than messing with
feta-autometric, you can define your own feta-flag-autometric.
> There is another rationale for doing this: i'm pretty sure that
> there's a limit of 256 glyphs per font. Until now there were only a
> handful of flags, but we're going to have many dozens of them; it's
> quite possible that either now or in the future we will reach the 256
> glyph limit.
I think that's reasonable. feta-noteheads was already separated because of
hitting the 256 glyph limit when we added shape noteheads in multiple
styles.
>
> What do you think? I remember that i tried doing this separation, but
> something didn't work. I hope i have that draft somewhere though.
I think that what causes problems is you lose the definition of
black-notehead-width (which comes from feta-noteheads).
>
>> On 6/9/11 9:02 AM, "Janek Warchoł" <lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Carl, you are great! After struggling with this shortened-flags issue
>>> for 5 months, i wouldn't have enough motivation to continue my work
>>> without your help!
>>> Right now I'm reading all the stuff that i did to remind myself where
>>> i am. As for now it looks that you are pointing me in the right
>>> direction!
>>
>> Glad to be of help! I really do like your work, and I want to see it
>> implemented in LilyPond.
>
> I'm so happy to hear this! Sometimes i have the impression that noone
> really cares.
> And wait till i start another project! It's gonna be about ties ;)
> Maybe i'll finish it before Lily 3.0...
Great!
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
