On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:27 AM, <mts...@gmail.com> wrote: > I figured not making a regtest just cuz there will already be little > changes to several regtests. But, I can certainly add one. > > Cheers, > MS > > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4898060/diff/1/lily/ledger-line-spanner.cc > File lily/ledger-line-spanner.cc (right): > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4898060/diff/1/lily/ledger-line-spanner.cc#newcode89 > lily/ledger-line-spanner.cc:89: continue; > On 2011/08/18 12:16:50, hanwenn wrote: >> >> can't you check poss.find(max(0, lincount - *it)) ? > >> I don't understand what this is supposed to do ; in which cases do you > > want to >> >> skip ledger creation? > > Good call - I can do this. > > It skips over all ledger lines that already have a note on them, thus > avoiding duplicates.
are you sure this works with chords that have seconds in them? It sounds like an optimization that doesn't really improve output at all, and performance not by much. Why not skip it altogether and avoid the complexity? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
