I know you've pushed a different patch, which fixes Issue 1900, but
doesn't fix
1997. Have you tried this patch to see if it fixes 1997?
I'll do so, but frankly, if it _does_ fix 1997, I don't want it pushed. Do you have a reference for Mike's analysis? It seems we should rather fix the segfault at its source than hide one way of getting it. http://codereview.appspot.com/5432081/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
