On 2011/11/26 15:07:17, dak wrote:
I'll do so, but frankly, if it _does_ fix 1997, I don't want it
pushed. Do you
have a reference for Mike's analysis?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-11/msg00556.html
It seems we should rather fix the segfault at its source than hide one
way of
getting it.
I agree with you. Thanks, Carl http://codereview.appspot.com/5432081/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
