"m...@apollinemike.com" <m...@apollinemike.com> writes: > On Jan 10, 2012, at 4:46 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > >> footnote-auto-numbering is present in the _code_. This is not just a >> question of the doc string. There _is_ user-level documentation in >> the notation manual (as a warning) mentioning, something like one has >> to set it to ##f if one wants to be using non-auto footnumbers. > > I just pushed a fix to staging that gets rid of this - the lookup was > useless, as the auto-numbering variable in this file always returned > true.
Well, this was not really intended as a bug report, more as a "if my not-yet-finished convert-ly rule will wreak awful havoc on \footnote within markup, I don't consider this a showstopper" notice. Of course, once you fix the really glaring problems with documentation and code, this reasoning will get old soon. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
