On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 05:27:00PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > I would very much prefer the work on Issue 2240 (aka 2070) to make it > into 2.16. It is a significant API change that should not occur during > a stable release series, and it paves the way for making the music > function work continue smoothly enough that backporting further > enhancements into a stable 2.16 series would be feasible.
IMO, significant API changes should not happen right before a release. Version numbers are cheap; why not have 2.18 in March 2012? Backporting is a huge hassle. But I'm not going to kick up a fuss about it. I've marked 2240 as Critical. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
