Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes: > On 1/21/12 10:37 AM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > >> >>I have actually found out that I promised too much about string numbers >>appearing on isolated notes: since the string number events _are_ >>listened to (likely by the tabstaff engraver team), the rhythmic music >>iterator _does_ broadcast them instead of leaving them as articulations. > > The tabstaff engraver team listens to *both* string number events *and* > articulations. Combining the two is a bit of a pain.
If nobody listens to string number events, they will stay articulations except when placed explicitly on chords like <c>\3 and then you deserve what you don't get. > That's why I asked earlier to get some consistency. If we can get > string number events to always be in articulations, we don't need to > broadcast string number events. If the rhythmic music iterator can > make them always show up as articulations, that would be great. That would be the case. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
