On 1/21/12 11:16 AM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes: > >> On 1/21/12 10:37 AM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >> >>> >>>I have actually found out that I promised too much about string numbers >>>appearing on isolated notes: since the string number events _are_ >>>listened to (likely by the tabstaff engraver team), the rhythmic music >>>iterator _does_ broadcast them instead of leaving them as articulations. >> >> The tabstaff engraver team listens to *both* string number events *and* >> articulations. Combining the two is a bit of a pain. > >If nobody listens to string number events, they will stay articulations >except when placed explicitly on chords like <c>\3 and then you deserve >what you don't get. > >> That's why I asked earlier to get some consistency. If we can get >> string number events to always be in articulations, we don't need to >> broadcast string number events. If the rhythmic music iterator can >> make them always show up as articulations, that would be great. > >That would be the case.
Great! I'll make tabstaff engraver stop listening to string number events once your patch is pushed. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
