On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:07:38PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > > The release blocking issues could be fixed with minor reverts. > > The usual release blockers are not revertible. Even if the current set > is get cleared out, history tells us that the time window of two weeks > after unstable release is unlikely to finish before the next detected > regression.
Well, we had at least a week when the only release-critical bug was the po-replace translation thing. It's a bit silly that we couldn't have a release due to a 5-line texinfo documentation thing, and in retrospect I should have done a "hostile revert" (especially since the commit in question didn't go through any review or countdown). But since the developer survey was coming up, I didn't want to open any new wounds. Also, I was more sick of arguments than normal, so again I didn't want to start a new fight. In hindsight I should have reverted it. And if there's no clear offer to fix it before tomorrow, I'll revert it anyway. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel