On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 07:19:28PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: > Le 26/06/2012 09:24, Graham Percival disait : > >Well, we had at least a week when the only release-critical bug > >was the po-replace translation thing. It's a bit silly that we > >couldn't have a release due to a 5-line texinfo documentation > >thing, and in retrospect I should have done a "hostile revert" > >(especially since the commit in question didn't go through any > >review or countdown). > > Issue 2524: Patch: CG: add updating of lilypond.pot in the release process > Comment 7 by lily...@orange.fr, May 14, 2012 > Pushed as > f7d264fa89c39f8d86e9ba5eb991ee904ce3d0be > > Please, Graham, read before writing nonsense! or express it in another way.
Comment 12: release-critical identified. (Graham) Comment 13: ok, revert it. (you) % I revert it Comment 16: fixes pushed to staging (John) Where was the review between comment 13 and 16? if there had been a review, I could have pointed out that the fix had essentially the same problem as the patch in comment 7. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel