>> The real question is whether is a need to do things like
>>
>> ligatures = { \[ s1 \] \[ s1 \] }
>> \new Voice << \melody \ligatures >>
>>
>> you'd have to ask jurgen reuter who wrote basically all the ancient
>> notation support.
>
> It would work to do
>
> ligatures = { s1\[ s1\]\[ <>\] }
>
> If we say "that's ugly", it's not like the situation would be any
> different with () [] \(\)
I'd do
ligatures = { s2\[ s2\] s2\[ s2\] }
(but I never did such a thing and don't intend to do in the future.
I use ligatures and the "push different things in a common Voice"
idiom extensively, but never together.)
p
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
