Am 26.09.2012 14:45, schrieb Thomas Morley:
[...] Hi Marc,an idea, don't know if it's really helpful: >From 2.16.0-bar-line.scm, bar-glyph-alist: The old definition of bar "empty" was: ("empty" . (() . ())) The old definition of bar "" was: ("" . ("" . "")) The new patch converts bar "empty" into bar ""
You are great! I found the same possible error while being at work, teaching students ;-) The latest patch set has indeed no difference between "empty" and "", that's why most of the regtests are wrong. I'll give it a try tomorrow, but I am 99.9% sure that after correcting this, everything will be ok.
[...]
Rubbish! :) I'm very happy that I had some ideas, you could run with. You managed to improve the ideas and their coding in an enormous degree. Great! :D
Thanks! I'll have to include some credits to you, anyway. Regards, Marc
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
