Am 26.09.2012 14:45, schrieb Thomas Morley:
[...]
Hi Marc,
an idea, don't know if it's really helpful:
>From 2.16.0-bar-line.scm, bar-glyph-alist:
The old definition of bar "empty" was: ("empty" . (() . ()))
The old definition of bar "" was: ("" . ("" . ""))
With regard to that, I have to make a distinction between
"" and '() in the new bar line interface.
What do you think would be better: using a symbol instead of '(),
so one can write
\defineBarLine "|" "|" 'none "|"
or using #f instead:
\defineBarLine "|" "|" #f "|"
or finally defining an "empty stencil" glyph:
\defineBarLine "|" "|" "x" "|"
(note that "" is not the same as "x", as Harm explained; "" draws a
stencil with
zero width, "X" would draw *no* stencil at all).
I think I'll go for the second option, but lemme know what you think
about it!
Regards,
Marc
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
