LGTM.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6568055/diff/1/mf/feta-scripts.mf File mf/feta-scripts.mf (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6568055/diff/1/mf/feta-scripts.mf#newcode1774 mf/feta-scripts.mf:1774: set_char_box (0, 1.7 staff_space# + epsilon, I suggest to use a tightest bounding box. At least I don't see any reason to not do so. The question is whether it makes sense to give this glyph a depth (this is, to make the glyph go below the baseline), but this is only a matter of taste. http://codereview.appspot.com/6568055/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
