Colin Hall-3 wrote > As I understand it this is a request for a new feature in Lilypond > that warns the user if they use \set on a property which can also be > manipulated using \override and \revert. > > Have I correctly understood this and, if so, does it make sense to > accept this feature request?
I think it's strange if LilyPond fades away and doesn't tell anything about a possible reason or whereabout an error occurred! if it makes sense to warn each time the user tries do do a \set on an item which usually is \override(n) is another question - personally I hate logs telling me all the things I never asked for; this could be added in the verbose output only. Eluze -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Feature-request-for-a-warning-if-set-is-misused-tp137816p137827.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel