On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 04:29:50AM -0800, Eluze wrote: > Colin Hall-3 wrote > > As I understand it this is a request for a new feature in Lilypond > > that warns the user if they use \set on a property which can also be > > manipulated using \override and \revert. > > > > Have I correctly understood this and, if so, does it make sense to > > accept this feature request? > > I think it's strange if LilyPond fades away and doesn't tell anything about > a possible reason or whereabout an error occurred! > > if it makes sense to warn each time the user tries do do a \set on an item > which usually is \override(n) is another question - personally I hate logs > telling me all the things I never asked for; this could be added in the > verbose output only.
OK, it looks like I have misunderstood the intention of your original bug report, Eluze. Please specify the circumstances under which you would like to see a warning. Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
