On 2012/12/30 16:42:56, dak wrote:
On 2012/12/30 16:30:45, J_lowe wrote: > Excuse my ignorance but is the \xxx-xxx-xxx ok in terms of
consistency of name
> of command and/or is 'draw' redundant?
\line arranges a text line, \draw-line draws an actual line, so the
name choice
seems ok. Another possibility would be to use properties to specify dotting/dashing and just use \draw-line (or \draw-circle and so on).
I thought about extending \draw-line with a 'style-property. But in extreme cases you would have to write: \markup { \override #'(style . dashed) \override #'(on . 0.5) \override #'(off . 0.2) \override #'(thickness . 2) \draw-line #'(4 . 1) } This seems a bit overlaoded to me. Therefore I decided to define separate markup-commands. Ok, this will reduce the needed \overrides only by one, but I think any \override less would be nice. And I'm thinking about writing additional commands for zigzag- and trill-style lines...
After all, lines are not the only things that might be desirable to do with a
different
line style.
Do you have anything particular in mind? https://codereview.appspot.com/7029045/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel