On 11 févr. 2013, at 16:29, d...@gnu.org wrote: > > https://codereview.appspot.com/7300082/diff/1/scm/define-grobs.scm > File scm/define-grobs.scm (right): > > https://codereview.appspot.com/7300082/diff/1/scm/define-grobs.scm#newcode2570 > scm/define-grobs.scm:2570: (Y-extent . ,pure-safe-stencil-height) > Are there grobs that don't have this definition of Y-extent?
Yes. > If it is > the same everywhere, do we even need an entry for it? > > https://codereview.appspot.com/7300082/diff/1/scm/output-lib.scm > File scm/output-lib.scm (right): > > https://codereview.appspot.com/7300082/diff/1/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode61 > scm/output-lib.scm:61: (define-public pure-safe-stencil-height > Perhaps add any information about the name? Its name claims to produce > a pure value, but it actually outputs callbacks both for pure and > unpure. What makes it "safe"? maybe unpure-pure-stencil-height is better? > > https://codereview.appspot.com/7300082/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
