On 17 févr. 2013, at 00:16, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: > It does looks reasonable to put the promise that a stencil does not > change with line-spacing, near the definiton fo the stencil, rather than > in a separate list. > > Just one question. If we override the stencil > \override NoteHead #'stencil = #stencil-notehead > then formerly LilyPond would avoid drawing it until after note-spacing, > giving an empty extent to note-spacing, so we would provide an estimated > extent like > \override NoteHead #'minimum-Y-extent = #'(-0.5 . 0.5) > for use in spacing of notes and accidentals. > > Now it seems the default will be that a user's stencil *is* evaluated at > the note-spacing stage, if the stencil it replaces was safe to evaluate > at that time. Is that what you wanted?
Yes. > > > https://codereview.appspot.com/7300082/diff/4002/scm/define-grobs.scm > File scm/define-grobs.scm (left): > > https://codereview.appspot.com/7300082/diff/4002/scm/define-grobs.scm#oldcode2728 > scm/define-grobs.scm:2728: (define pure-print-callbacks > This could have had a comment: "These print routines do not depend on > the spacing of a line, and we require that they do not depend on the > spacing of a line, so they can be evaluated to determine the space > needed at the note-spacing stage." > > https://codereview.appspot.com/7300082/diff/4002/scm/output-lib.scm > File scm/output-lib.scm (right): > > https://codereview.appspot.com/7300082/diff/4002/scm/output-lib.scm#newcode60 > scm/output-lib.scm:60: > ;; Using this as a callback for a grob's Y-extent promises > ;; that the grob's stencil does not depend on line-spacing. > ;; We use this promise to figure the space required by Clefs > ;; and such at the note-spacing stage. > > https://codereview.appspot.com/7300082/ Comment added. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
