On 2013/04/16 11:11:03, janek wrote:
2013/4/16 <d...@gnu.org>: > I hate it when I get last-minute realizations. Here is another
thing we
> need to do for the stable release: go through all problems of the
"too
> snug" kind and work out defaults that avoid them.
This might be impossible. For example to avoid this problem { d''4-.\downbow } we'd have to turn off or significantly pad Scripts skylines, and that will result in wrong placement in other cases.
"Wrong placement"? Seriously? Can you give any articulation where you'd get bad behavior for considering just its bounding box? Most are rather compact anyway, and I don't see how we get an advantage from being able to sink the dot of a tenuto into a bow marking. For inter-script spacing, skylines seem like the entirely wrong thing to use. It is conceivable that you can avoid shifting some unrelated accidental more than a minimum, but that's a harmless problem compared to scripts creeping into one another. In general, skylines are mostly nice for grouping _unrelated_ material. For several things of the _same_ kind, you usually don't want to shift them into one another. https://codereview.appspot.com/8613043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel